The problem with unity is that there are too many opinions that didn’t exist in the formative days of the church, we say. Things are different now. The church in its earliest state didn’t have denominations vying against each other, we are quick to point out. Factions didn’t battle each other for supremacy, and a million divergent opinions weren’t warring against themselves.
That’s right. Things are different now. That’s my point. Let’s get back to the way things were in the beginning, before the unity of believers was spoiled by factions and opinions of men.
Things are different now
The problem with unity is that there are too many opinions that didn’t exist in the formative days of the church, we say. Things are different now. The church in its earliest state didn’t have denominations vying against each other, we are quick to point out. Factions didn’t battle each other for supremacy, and a million divergent opinions weren’t warring against themselves.
That’s right. Things are different now. That’s my point. Let’s get back to the way things were in the beginning, before the unity of believers was spoiled by factions and opinions of men.
<sigh>
About Editor
Newshound, writer, digital marketer, passionate about Jesus, unity, liberty, family, foster care & adoption.What you can read next
Speculative theology
Saying it doesn’t make it so
Adoption: pure and faultless religion